Critique The King Of Comedy


The King Of Comedy




       Though The king of Comedy isn’t one of the most famous Scorsese’s films, it is still one of the finest achievement both in directing and acting. 

Robert de Niro, in his fourth collaboration with Scorsese, plays Rupert Pupkin, an hopeful, but talentless comedian, who thinks of his meeting with Jerry Langford (Jerry Lewis) as his “break”. Though Langford turns down his request, Rupert comes to think he has an appointment with Jerry, up to a point where he can’t distinguish the truth from his own fantasy. To finally return to reality, bitter, angry, wanting more than ever to gain recognition.

Contrary to what one could think due to its title, The king of Comedy isn’t a comedy. The film is filled with suppressed anger, restrained violence and characters trying to find a way to achieve their dream. Though Rupert is a monomaniac, annoying and totally lousy, he is really moving, for his total inability to mix with people, a bit like a more pacifist Travis.

If De Niro’s performance is terribly effective, it is supported by Jerry Lewis’s one, whose role suits him incredibly well. Every detail is noticeable; the way he talks, the way he walks, waves, and, mostly, the looks he gives. I remember particularly the moment when he finds out Rupert has entered his house, and how he listens to his explanations, with a mixture of anger and incredulity, giving him just the right amount of consternation in his look.

The ending of the film is a debate subject ; is it really happening ? Is it just another Pupkin’s fantasy ? Or does it really matter? Not for Pupkin anywhere, because he, at least, has reached his goal.

The king of comedy,
1983,

Directed by Martin Scorsese


A.P.